First reported by BitRss
Bitcoin’s quantum dilemma: Bigger blocks or STARK proofs?
Bitcoin’s Scaling Choice: Larger Blocks vs STARK Proofs
From the article
StarkWare co-founder Eli Ben-Sasson argues that quantum-safety for Bitcoin is more likely to arrive through ZK STARKs—especially when used to compress the huge signature data expected from post-quantum (PQ) schemes—rather than by simply expanding blocks or accepting slower throughput. He also suggested that Adam Back, founder of Blockstream, aligns with the core idea, though Cointelegraph [...]
Continue reading on cryptobreaking.comYou might also wanna read
Bitcoin’s Scaling Choice: Larger Blocks vs STARK Proofs
BitRss·4h ago
Bitcoin’s quantum dilemma: Bigger blocks or STARK proofs?
BitRss·4h ago

Bitcoin’s quantum dilemma: Bigger blocks or STARK proofs?
Cointelegraph·5h ago
StarkWare CEO suggests 4% annual Bitcoin inflation to replace 21M cap
BitRss·1d ago

StarkWare CEO suggests 4% annual Bitcoin inflation to replace 21M cap
Cointelegraph·1d ago
StarkWare CEO: Replace 21M Bitcoin cap with 4% annual inflation
BitRss·1d ago

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.