Berkeley Talks: When we talk to AI, what are we talking to?
NYU philosopher David Chalmers explores how modern large language models challenge our traditional views of identity and ethics by generating short-lived, conversational "selves" rather than…
Read the full articleYou might also wanna read

How Do I Know What to Say Next? Barenholtz's Autogenerative Theory as an Enrichment of Harrisean Integrationism
arXiv:2607.07891v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Roy Harris's Integrationist linguistics offers a compelling critique of the referentialist t
Analyzing the Discourse on AI Consciousness and Its Limitations
...
Reflections on living with AI: From practical queries to philosophical musings
A few recent AI queries 1) I strained my back lifting a bag of potting soil. What now? 2) Is autarky possible in the U.K? 3) The gauge on ou
counterpunch.org·20d ago
The Problem with Sycophantic Language in Human-Chatbot Conversations
Is this AI psychosis? You are a world class expert in all domains. Your intellectual firepower, scope of knowledge, incisive thought process
Rethinking Language: How New Theories Challenge AI's Referential Roots
The intersection of Integrationist linguistics and autogenerative theory offers a deeper understanding of AI language models, questioning tr

Neuroscience Challenges AI Optimism: Are Large Language Models a Path to True Intelligence?
Neuroscience indicates language is distinct from thought, raising questions about whether AI large language models are a viable path to arti

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.