All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Benchmark Comparison: Windows File Transfer Tool Speeds Show Copy-Item 27% Slower Than Drag-and-Drop

By

hiAndrewQuinn

5mo ago· 6 min readenInsight

Summary

The article presents benchmark results comparing file transfer speeds of various Windows tools, revealing that PowerShell's Copy-Item command is 27% slower than File Explorer's drag-and-drop method. The author shares personal frustration with these performance discrepancies discovered while setting up a home lab network. The benchmarks show drag-and-drop achieving ~112 MBps, Copy-Item at ~82 MBps, SFTP at ~70 MBps, robocopy with multithreading at ~25 MBps, and WSL 2 rsync at only ~13 MBps, highlighting significant performance variations between different file transfer methods on Windows.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
Copy-Item ~82 -27%
Drag and drop ~112 —
I feel like I'm losing my mind.
robocopy (with /MT:32) ~25 MBps -78%
rsync (WSL 2) ~13 MBps -88%
Snippet from the RSS feed
1 2 3 4 5 File Explorer drag & drop ########## (112 MBps) Copy-Item ####### (82 MBps) Built in SFTP client ###### (70 MBps) Built in robocopy (/MT:32) ## (25 MBps) WSL 2 rsync # (13 MBps) In table form: Tool Speed (MBps) Difference Drag and drop ~112 &mda

You might also wanna read