All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Benchmark Analysis: AVX2 Runs Slower Than SSE2-4.x Under Windows ARM Emulation

By

vintagedave

3mo ago· 12 min readenInsight

Summary

The article investigates the performance of AVX2 versus SSE2-4.x instruction sets when running under Windows ARM emulation. The author conducted benchmarks and discovered that contrary to expectations, AVX2 code runs significantly slower - at about two-thirds the speed of equivalent SSE2-SSE4.x optimized code when emulated on Windows 11 ARM. The post details the testing methodology, benchmark results, and provides practical guidance for developers on whether to compile for AVX2 if their applications might run on Windows ARM systems.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
AVX2 code runs at 2/3 the speed of equivalent SSE2-SSE4.x optimised code under emulation on Windows 11 ARM.
I assumed it would be roughly the same — maybe slightly slower due to emulation overhead, but AVX2's wider operations would compensate. The headline gives it away: I was wrong.
If you compile your app for AVX2 and it runs on Windows ARM under Prism emulation, is it faster or slower than compiling for SSE2-4.x?
'Should I compile for AVX2 if my app might run on Windows ARM?' has a
Snippet from the RSS feed
If you compile your app for AVX2 and it runs on Windows ARM under Prism emulation, is it faster or slower than compiling for SSE2-4.x? I assumed it would be roughly the same — maybe slightly slower due to emulation overhead, but AVX2's wider operations w

You might also wanna read