Universities should ensure students can function without AI before allowing its use
By
eSchool Media Contributors
Summary
This article argues that universities are asking the wrong questions about AI in education. Instead of focusing on banning AI, detecting its use, or setting disclosure rules, institutions should prioritize ensuring students can meaningfully function without AI. The author contends that performance has historically been treated as evidence of competence, but AI use — even when permitted — bypasses the struggle through which genuine learning occurs. The piece calls for a fundamental rethinking of assessment and the purpose of education in the age of AI.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledFor most of history, performance was treated as evidence of competence. A strong essay suggested strong writing skills.
Even when students use AI entirely within institutional rules, they still most likely bypass the struggle through which learning often occurs.
Should AI be banned? Should students disclose use? How much AI use is acceptable? Are students abusing it? While these questions dominate the discussion, the more important objective is making sure students can meaningfully function without AI.
You might also wanna read
Universities must rethink how they prepare students for an AI-powered world, study argues
Students Use AI Out of Necessity, Not Enthusiasm, as Campus Tensions Rise
The article discusses how university students are increasingly using AI tools like ChatGPT for academic work, but many harbor resentment or
Why Authentic Education Must Go Beyond AI-Generated Content
This commentary argues that authentic education must transcend the mere production of words and content, especially in an era where AI can g


Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.