All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Security
Security
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

AI targeting systems Lavender and Gospel violate international humanitarian law by design, academic analysis finds

By

Authors: Rainer Rehak, Taylor Kate Woodcock

10d ago· 3 min readenInsight

Summary

This academic article analyzes three AI-based targeting systems used by the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza since 2023 — 'Lavender', 'Gospel', and 'Where's daddy?' — and evaluates their compliance with International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Drawing on expertise from computer science, science and technology studies, and international law, the authors describe the technical architecture of these systems, their reliance on US tech infrastructure (Microsoft, Amazon, Google), and their configuration for target production and civilian harm. The evaluation against IHL principles of distinction, precautions, and proportionality finds that the systems violate all three principles by design. Key findings include: (1) the systems show reckless disregard for lawful target selection, (2) they enable mass target generation without substantive legal justification, and (3) their probabilistic nature makes them akin to indiscriminate 'dumb bombs'. The authors argue that civilian casualties are not accidents but directly configured into the systems, and that the term 'targeted killing' serves as a discursive red herring to maintain an appearance of ethical conduct.

Source

bskyAI targeting systems Lavender and Gospel violate international humanitarian law by design, academic analysis findsdl.acm.org

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
The explicit and implicit configuration of the desired outcomes, including civilian harm, constitutes a reckless disregard for the selection of lawful targets, hence violating the principles of distinction and precautions under IHL.
The systems enable entirely new modes of operation by allowing an arbitrary number of targets, including high numbers of unintended engagements of civilians, to be generated per day with virtually no substantive and legal justification.
These AI-enabled systems are probabilistic in nature and, as a consequence, more akin to traditional large indiscriminate 'dumb bombs', hence violating all three key principles of the IHL framework when relied upon uncritically.
The masses of civilian casualties are not 'accidents' in an otherwise 'precise' system but that they have been directly configured into the systems.
The massively lethal use of such systems can be plausibly assumed to be deliberate. Yet, still describing their function as 'targeted killing' could furthermore be understood as discursive red herring for keeping up an appearance of ethical conduct.
Snippet from the RSS feed
This article describes, analyses and evaluates the AI-based targeting systems ‘Lavender’, ‘Gospel’ and 'Where's daddy?', which the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have been using in Gaza since 2023. We specifically address the question of where the masses of

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.