Australian creatives demand AI companies pay for use of their work in training
A brief opinion piece arguing that tech companies training AI on creative works should pay creators, just as individuals and institutions do to access those works. The article questions why AI companies should be exempt from compensating writers, musicians, and artists when they expect users to pay for their AI products.
2d ago1 min readenOpinion
Key quotes
It seems like a naive question, but why should it be any different for the tech companies who are presently helping themselves to whatever material they can get their hands on, so as to train their AI agents?
Particularly if the same tech companies expect users to pay to access their AI products.
Of course all writers, artists, musicians, etc, wherever they are, should be receiving compensation if an
From the article
Australian authors, songwriters, musicians demand payment from AI companies. Everyone else has to pay somehow to access their work, the same goes for tech companies
Continue reading on disassociated.comYou might also wanna read
How Musicians Can Get Paid for Training AI
IEEE·21d ago
Creativity in the age of AI
ABC·4y ago
Best AI Tools for Content Creators: The 4 I Actually Pay For (And One I Cancelled)
Techloy·2h ago
India AI Royalties Proposal Mandates Copyright Payments
ASO World·7mo ago
In the age of AI content generation, creative taste matters more than production skills
The article argues that the creative industry has undergone a fundamental shift: production is no longer the bottleneck in creative work. Wi
Creative Boom·20d ago
Adobe convenes creative industry leaders to explore AI's practical impact on creative work
Adobe is bringing together creative industry leaders to navigate the practical realities of AI in creative work, moving beyond the polarized
Creative Boom·5mo ago
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.