All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Why "no source code was copied" may not be a sufficient copyright defense in software cases

By

oscgam1

5h ago· 4 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses the nuances of copyright law in software, specifically whether "no source code was copied" remains a valid defense. It explains that nonliteral copying (not bit-exact matches) can still constitute copyright infringement under the "substantial similarity" standard, which requires proving both access to the original work and similarity between works. The piece highlights that most copyright cases that go to trial involve substantial similarity rather than exact copying, suggesting that the defense of not copying source code may be insufficient in many cases.

Source

Hacker NewsWhy "no source code was copied" may not be a sufficient copyright defense in software casesnews.ycombinator.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The first thing to note is that nonliteral copying can still be infringing.
Actually, among copyright cases that actually go to trial, most of them are not bit-exact matches ('striking similarity' in legalese).
The lower standard those cases would have to meet is substantial similarity, which requires proving both access and similarity.
Snippet from the RSS feed
There's a couple of related issues being conflated here, and I'm not sure which one to bring up, mainly because I'm not sure in what direction the copying would be ruled to have gone. So I'll just mention all the cases.

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.