Why "no source code was copied" may not be a sufficient copyright defense in software cases
By
oscgam1
Summary
The article discusses the nuances of copyright law in software, specifically whether "no source code was copied" remains a valid defense. It explains that nonliteral copying (not bit-exact matches) can still constitute copyright infringement under the "substantial similarity" standard, which requires proving both access to the original work and similarity between works. The piece highlights that most copyright cases that go to trial involve substantial similarity rather than exact copying, suggesting that the defense of not copying source code may be insufficient in many cases.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledThe first thing to note is that nonliteral copying can still be infringing.
Actually, among copyright cases that actually go to trial, most of them are not bit-exact matches ('striking similarity' in legalese).
The lower standard those cases would have to meet is substantial similarity, which requires proving both access and similarity.
You might also wanna read

800+ Artists Launch "Stealing Isn't Innovation" Campaign Against AI Copyright Infringement
Over 800 artists, writers, actors, and musicians have signed the "Stealing Isn't Innovation" campaign, warning against AI companies' large-s
Why the CNN-Perplexity AI Lawsuit Differs from Other AI Copyright Cases
CNN has filed a lawsuit against Perplexity AI, alleging the company copied over 17,000 CNN articles, videos, and images without permission t
CNN's Copyright Lawsuit Against Perplexity AI Could Reshape Fair-Use Doctrine for AI Companies
CNN has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Perplexity AI, alleging the AI company copied over 17,000 CNN stories without permiss
CNN Sues Perplexity AI for Copyright Infringement Over 17,000 Pieces of Content
CNN has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against AI search engine Perplexity, accusing it of copying and distributing over 17,000 of C

Palworld changing game mechanics because of Nintendo lawsuit isn’t an admission of infringement, Japanese patent attorney stresses
AI-Generated Content and the First Amendment: Legal Challenges Ahead
The article examines the First Amendment implications of AI-generated content, using the case of Steven Thaler's AI-generated image "A Recen

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.