Artificial intelligence’s ability to enrich science will depend not only on model capability, but also on whether researchers, reviewers and funders reward originality over speed, says Xizhe Zhang
12d ago· 1 min readNews
Source
Artificial intelligence’s ability to enrich science will depend not only on model capability, but also on whether researchers, reviewers and funders reward originality over speed, says Xizhe Zhang
You might also wanna read

AI and Publish-or-Perish Culture Are Overwhelming Academic Peer Review, Study Finds
This article, authored by the AI Task Force for Organization Science, examines how generative AI is reshaping academic peer review and resea
pubsonline.informs.org·1mo ago
Will AI spark a scientific renaissance — or a diffuse monoculture?
nature.com·4d ago
Researchers Uncover Hidden Ingredients Behind AI Creativity
quantamagazine.org·1y ago

Author's Reflection on AI Capabilities and Unbelievable Discoveries
The article discusses the author's skepticism towards AI capabilities and a recent discovery in SFO that challenges what is considered possi
ghuntley.com·11mo agoWhy supervised learning AI cannot make truly novel scientific discoveries
The article presents a recorded speech arguing that generative AI trained via supervised learning is fundamentally incapable of making truly

Neuroscience Challenges AI Optimism: Are Large Language Models a Path to True Intelligence?
The article examines the ambitious claims by tech leaders like Mark Zuckerberg, Dario Amodei, and Sam Altman about achieving superintelligen

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.