All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

Anthropic Hires Stanford Economist Who Argued 33% AI Extinction Risk Is Worth Economic Benefits

By

Frank Landymore

3h ago· 3 min readenNews

Summary

Anthropic has hired Stanford economist Chad Jones, who previously authored a paper arguing that a 33 percent chance of human extinction from AI could be acceptable if weighed against the economic growth benefits AI would bring. The article highlights the apparent contradiction between Anthropic's strong public stance on AI safety and its hiring of an economist who endorses a relatively high tolerance for existential risk in exchange for economic gains.

Source

bskyAnthropic Hires Stanford Economist Who Argued 33% AI Extinction Risk Is Worth Economic Benefitsshare.google

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Out of all the big AI players, Anthropic is the one that likes to doomsay about AI the most — because it's also the most concerned about AI safety, of course.
Jones — a longtime Stanford economics professor — once wrote a paper that weighed up what would be an acceptable risk level of human extinction from AI, against the potential benefits it would bring
the economic growth AI will bring is worth a 33 percent chance of human extinction.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Anthropic hired a Stanford economist who said that the economic growth AI will bring is worth a 33 percent chance of human extinction.

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.