All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Analyzing the Rhetorical Function of "It Turns Out" in Writing

By

Munksgaard

2mo ago· 4 min readenInsight

Summary

The article analyzes the phrase "it turns out" as a writing device, tracing the author's adoption of the phrase to reading Paul Graham's essays in 2006. The author examines how Graham effectively uses the phrase to structure arguments and reveal insights, contrasting this with weaker uses where the phrase serves as a crutch for writers who haven't done sufficient analytical work. The piece explores the rhetorical function of "it turns out" in persuasive writing and its relationship to genuine discovery versus manufactured surprise.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
It turns out that 'it turns out' does the sort of work, for a writer, that a writer should be doing himself.
He works it, gets mileage out of it, in a way that other writers don't.
I think not. It's not that pg is a particularly heavy user of the phrase—I counted just 46 unique instances in a simple search of his site—but that he knows how to use it.
That probably sounds like a compliment. But it turns out...
The phrase is a kind of rhetorical sleight of hand, a way of making the writer's own reasoning seem like an objective discovery.
Snippet from the RSS feed
"It turns out" became a favorite phrase of mine sometime in mid 2006, which, it turns out, was just about the time that I first started tearing through Paul Graham essays. Coincidence?

You might also wanna read