All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

AI Detection Tools Like Pangram Are Creating a Crisis of False Accusations in Publishing

By

Matteo Wong

15h ago· 9 min readenInsight

Summary

The article examines the growing problem of AI-detection tools, particularly Pangram, being used to accuse writers of passing off AI-generated content as their own. It highlights several high-profile cases where Pangram flagged texts as AI-generated, including a horror novel pulled before release, articles in major newspapers, and award-winning short stories. The article argues that while AI-detection tools are improving, they remain unreliable and can produce false positives, potentially damaging reputations and livelihoods. It explores the broader implications for publishing, journalism, and creative writing in an era where AI-generated text is increasingly prevalent.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Basically every recent, high-profile accusation of someone passing off AI-generated writing as their own has started in the same way: with a tool called Pangram.
In March, when a horror novel from a major publishing house was pulled just days before its scheduled U.S. release date, it was in part because Pangram, an AI-detection program, had identified the text as AI-generated.
AI-detection tools are getting better. But they still aren't good enough.
Snippet from the RSS feed
AI-detection tools are getting better. But they still aren’t good enough.

You might also wanna read