All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

AI Model Performance Comparison: Claude Sonnet 4.5 Leads in CAPTCHA Solving Tests

By

mdahardy

6mo ago· 7 min readenInsight

Summary

The article presents a benchmarking study comparing three leading AI models—Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and GPT-5—on their ability to solve Google reCAPTCHA v2 challenges. The testing revealed significant performance differences: Claude Sonnet 4.5 achieved the highest success rate at 60%, slightly outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro at 56%, while GPT-5 performed significantly worse with only a 28% success rate. The research examines how well modern CAPTCHA systems hold up against advanced AI agents.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Claude Sonnet 4.5 performed best with a 60% success rate, slightly outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro at 56%
GPT-5 performed significantly worse and only managed to solve CAPTCHAs on 28% of trials
Many sites use CAPTCHAs to distinguish humans from automated traffic. How well do these CAPTCHAs hold up against modern AI agents?
Snippet from the RSS feed
We evaluate three leading AI models—Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic), Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google), and GPT-5 (OpenAI)—on their ability to solve Google reCAPTCHA v2 challenges.

You might also wanna read