All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
AI
AI
Business
Business
Entertainment
Entertainment
News
News
Programming
Programming
Security
Security
Science
Science
Design
Design
Environment
Environment
Finance
Finance
Crypto
Crypto
Politics
Politics
Sports
Sports
Education
Education
Gaming
Gaming
Art
Art
Music
Music
Health
Health
Books
Books
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter

CSS sibling-index() and sibling-count(): A New Approach to Staggered Animations Without JavaScript

By

About The Author

1mo ago· 12 min readenInsight

Summary

This article introduces two new CSS functions — sibling-index() and sibling-count() — that allow developers to create staggered cascade animations (e.g., cards fading in one after another) without relying on :nth-child() rules or JavaScript workarounds. The author explains how these functions work, compares them to older approaches, and demonstrates their scalability (works for 5 items or 5,000). The piece covers practical use cases, browser support considerations, and the broader implications for CSS layout and animation workflows.

Source

Smashing MagazineCSS sibling-index() and sibling-count(): A New Approach to Staggered Animations Without JavaScriptsmashingmagazine.com

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
You know that thing where you have a grid of cards, and you want them to fade in one after another? That staggered cascade effect. Looks great. Should be simple.
And yet every time I've built it, the implementation has made me feel like I'm doing something fundamentally stupid.
Works for 5 items or 5,000.
Staggered cascade effect in one line of CSS without :nth-child() rules or JS workarounds.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Meet `sibling-index()` and `sibling-count()`. Staggered cascade effect in one line of CSS without `:nth-child()` rules or JS workarounds. Works for 5 items or 5,000.

You might also wanna read

Comments

Sign in to join the conversation.

No comments yet. Be the first.