Study finds 'climate progressive' nations' mitigation plans fall short of Paris Agreement targets by factor of two
By
Isak Stoddard
29d ago· 39 min readenInsight
Summary
This article critically examines the gap between the Paris Agreement's climate targets (well below 2°C, pursuing 1.5°C) and the actual mitigation plans of so-called 'climate progressive' nations. It argues that global modeling studies rely too heavily on speculative negative emissions technologies (NETs) rather than realistic emissions reductions, and that even the most ambitious national plans fall short by approximately a factor of two compared to what is actually needed for Paris-compliant pathways.
Source
Key quotes
· 3 pulledThe Paris Agreement establishes an international covenant to reduce emissions in line with holding the increase in temperature to 'well below 2°C … and to pursue … 1.5°C.'
Global modelling studies have repeatedly concluded that such commitments can be delivered through technocratic adjustments to contemporary society, principally price mechanisms driving technical change.
However, as emissions have continued to rise, so these models have come to increasingly rely on the extensive deployment of highly speculative negative emissions technologies (NETs).
1. The 2015 Paris Agreement established an unprecedented international covenant to hold ‘the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C… and to pursue efforts to limit the tempera...
You might also wanna read

Climate neutrality in cities: how to make best use of negative emissions?
ema.europa.eu·1mo ago

Local climate action delivers, but more efforts are needed to meet 2030 goals
ema.europa.eu·17d ago

Climate Scenario Corrections Strengthen, Not Weaken, the Case for Rapid Action in Europe
The article examines recent climate science developments — including the scrapping of the most extreme climate scenario (RCP 8.5), the retra

Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
No comments yet. Be the first.