Healthcare AI needs patient leadership in governance, argues Donna Cryer
By
Callum Turner
Toasted golden, schmeared with insight. Top of the rack.
Summary
Donna R. Cryer argues that AI is being rapidly introduced into healthcare without adequate governance or meaningful involvement from patients, who are the most affected stakeholders. She calls for patient leadership in AI governance, emphasizing that those who live with health conditions must have a seat at the table when decisions are made about AI systems that impact clinical care, operations, and health equity.
Key quotes
· 2 pulledArtificial intelligence is entering healthcare at a pace that risks outpacing the governance structures needed to support it responsibly.
Hospitals, payers, pharmaceutical companies, and digital health organizations are introducing AI systems into clinical and operational environments without sufficiently involving the people most affected by those decisions, which are the patients.
You might also wanna read
Why patients should be cautious about AI scribing systems in medical appointments
Emily M. Bender and Decca Muldowney argue against the use of AI-powered automatic scribing systems in healthcare settings. The article detai
buttondown.com·1mo agoCritique of Authoritarian Approaches to AI Governance and Development
The article critiques the top-down, authoritarian approach to AI development and governance presented in works like Dario's 'The Adolescence