All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Amazon VP argues human-in-the-loop AI governance is flawed because humans are inconsistent

By

Jessica Lyons

1h ago· 8 min readenNews

Summary

Amazon's VP of Security, Eric Brandwine, argues against "human-in-the-loop" AI governance by pointing out that humans are inherently inconsistent, non-deterministic, and prone to errors just like AI systems. He suggests that relying on humans as a safety check for AI is flawed because humans themselves make mistakes, hallucinate, and cannot guarantee consistent outputs. The article explores Amazon's perspective that AI governance should not assume human superiority or consistency in oversight roles.

Source

bskyAmazon VP argues human-in-the-loop AI governance is flawed because humans are inconsistenttheregister.com

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Humans tend to be 'a little bit precious about humans'
'But when you actually get down to it, humans are not terribly consistent'
Humans, like AI agents and systems, are non-deterministic. Neither can be guaranteed to produce the same output given the same input twice.
Snippet from the RSS feed
VP Eric Brandwine explains people aren't all that great, actually

You might also wanna read