All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

School phone ban debate overlooks disabled students who rely on phones as assistive technology

4d ago· 5 min readenOpinion

Summary

This article critiques the debate around school phone bans, arguing that both sides focus too narrowly on average student outcomes while ignoring the impact on disabled students who rely on phones as assistive technology. The author specifically responds to Emily Oster's New York Times op-ed, claiming she misreads several studies. The piece highlights that at least 37 states and DC now require phone restrictions, yet research has largely failed to measure consequences for students with disabilities whose phones serve essential assistive functions.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
the debate she is contributing to, on both sides, has a larger problem: it is almost entirely about whether bans help the average student, and almost silent on what they cost the students who depend on their phones to learn
The research behind school phone bans has largely not measured what happens to disabled students whose phones serve as assistive technology
I wrote an annotated edition of that piece — I think she misreads several of the studies she cites
Snippet from the RSS feed
The research behind school phone bans has largely not measured what happens to disabled students whose phones serve as assistive technology.

You might also wanna read