All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

NBA Finals discourse inevitably turns to nitpicking officiating, especially around Wembanyama

By

Chris Thompson

2d ago· 7 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article discusses the inevitable shift in NBA Finals discourse toward nitpicking officiating, using the challenge of officiating Victor Wembanyama as a central example. The author argues that nuanced, middle-ground observations about refereeing are nearly impossible in the polarized, high-stakes environment of the Finals, where any comment is likely to be distorted or weaponized by partisan fans.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Nobody wants to think about officiating, much less talk about it.
The NBA Finals are no occasion for rational nonpartisanship. The middle ground is out of reach.
Referees are still sorting out how to protect Victor Wembanyama from a kind of mauling that only he faces.
Unless I surround the statement in 1,000 caveats... my observation is guaranteed to zoom right past the part of th
Snippet from the RSS feed
Nobody wants to think about officiating, much less talk about it. Joyce Carol Oates knows it. The NBA Finals are no occasion for rational nonpartisanship. The middle ground is out of reach. If I want to say something straightforwardly true about the offic

You might also wanna read