All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why stockmarket prices are unreliable predictors of the future

By

The Economist

5h ago· 1 min readenInsight

Summary

This article critiques the efficient-market hypothesis, arguing that stockmarket prices are influenced by far more than just new information. Using a humorous analogy comparing economists to horse-studiers, it suggests that financial theory often fails to reflect real-world trading floor realities. The piece is a brief opinionated commentary on the limitations of economic models in predicting the future through stock markets.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
If economists wished to study the horse, they wouldn't go and look at horses. They'd sit in their studies and say to themselves: 'What would I do if I were a horse?'
But at least horses tend to be spared such attention; finance types do not.
One economic idea is especially liable to get them snorting with impatience and asking whether the person who cites it has been near a trading floor.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Share prices are buffeted by far more than just new information

You might also wanna read