All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Understanding the Orthogonal Relationship Between Memory Safety and Sandboxing in Linux Security

By

pizlonator

5mo ago· 5 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses the relationship between memory safety and sandboxing in Linux security, explaining that they are orthogonal concepts that work best when combined. It clarifies that memory safety prevents certain types of vulnerabilities while sandboxing restricts what processes can do, but notes that sandboxes often have intentional holes for communication with privileged broker processes. The article warns that attackers can exploit memory safety bugs to make sandboxed processes send malicious messages to these brokers, potentially breaking through the sandbox. The key takeaway is that comprehensive security requires both memory safety and proper sandboxing implementation.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
Memory safety and sandboxing are two different things. It's reasonable to think of them as orthogonal: you could have memory safety but not be sandboxed, or you could be sandboxed but not memory safe.
In practice, sandboxes have holes by design. A typical sandbox allows the program to send and receive messages to broker processes that have higher privileges.
So, an attacker may first use a memory safety bug to make the sandboxed process send malicious messages, and then use those malicious messages to break into the brokers.
The best kind of defense is to have both a sandbox and memory safety.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Memory safety and sandboxing are two different things. It's reasonable to think of them as orthogonal: you could have memory safety but not be sandboxed, or you could be sandboxed but not memory safe.

You might also wanna read

Singularity: A Stealthy Linux Kernel Rootkit for Modern 6.x Kernels

Singularity is a sophisticated Linux Kernel Module (LKM) rootkit designed for modern 6.x kernels that provides comprehensive stealth capabil

github.com·4mo ago

Security Analysis: Exploiting Kernel Stack Use-After-Free Vulnerabilities in NVIDIA's Linux GPU Drivers

This technical article details two critical security vulnerabilities discovered in NVIDIA's Linux Open GPU Kernel Modules - specifically a k

blog.quarkslab.com·7mo ago

North Korean Chollima Group Targets PHP Developers via Malicious Packagist Package

A malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload was discovered appended to tailwind.js in the Packagist development version dev-drewroberts/featur

socket.dev·5h ago

Microsoft uncovers supply chain attack: Compromised @antv npm packages steal CI/CD credentials via Mini Shai-Hulud malware

Microsoft has identified an active supply chain attack targeting the @antv npm package ecosystem. A threat actor compromised an @antv mainta

microsoft.com·19h ago

AI-assisted vulnerability discovery raises concerns about Linux kernel security

This opinion article discusses a troubling trend in Linux security where AI-powered tools are being used to discover and exploit kernel vuln

theregister.com·1d ago

npm malware targeting Claude users leaks own GitHub token, reaches 676 downloads

An npm package called "mouse5212-super-formatter" targeting Claude users acted as information-stealing malware, reaching 676 downloads befor

theregister.com·1d ago