All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

The cost of curbing China research collaboration outweighs the security risks, Australian academics argue

By

University of Technology Sydney

1h ago· 6 min readenOpinion

Summary

James Laurenceson and Wanning Sun argue that Australia's campaign to curb university research collaboration with China, framed as a national security measure, is counterproductive. While acknowledging that research security concerns are not unfounded (citing a 2023 ASIO disclosure of Chinese intelligence infiltration), they contend that overreaction risks making Australia smaller and less attractive to global scientific talent. The authors advocate for a balanced approach that manages risks without sacrificing the benefits of international scientific collaboration.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
National security is not strengthened by making Australia smaller and less attractive to scientific talent
The near decade-old campaign to frame Australian university research collaboration with China as a national security threat is experiencing a renewed burst
Fears around research security are not made up. In 2023, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation disclosed a plot by China's intelligence services to 'infiltrate a prestigious Australian institution'
Snippet from the RSS feed
National security is not strengthened by making Australia smaller and less attractive to scientific talent, say James Laurenceson and Wanning Sun.

You might also wanna read

NIH and NASA impose new restrictions on international research collaborations, causing confusion among scientists

U.S. government research funders, including the NIH and NASA, have imposed unprecedented restrictions on U.S. scientists collaborating and p

science.org·17d ago

NIH and NASA impose new restrictions on international research collaborations, causing confusion among scientists

U.S. government research funders, including the NIH and NASA, have imposed unprecedented restrictions on U.S. scientists collaborating and p

science.org·17d ago

China pressured UK university to halt human rights research through intimidation campaign

Documents reveal that China conducted a campaign of harassment and intimidation against Sheffield Hallam University to force it to shut down

bbc.com·7mo ago

Study Exposes Sophisticated Global Networks Behind Scientific Fraud

An alarming analysis reveals the growing sophistication and scale of scientific fraud, with paper mills, publishers, journals, and brokers f

science.org·10mo ago

NIH Halts Tuberculosis Research Over Unfounded 'Dangerous' Gain-of-Function Concerns

A UC Berkeley professor and NIH grant recipient describes how the NIH abruptly ordered them to stop their tuberculosis research, deeming it

statnews.com·8mo ago

The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient and growing

doi.org·3mo ago

Discussion on Institutional Resistance and Compliance Strategies in Political Contexts

The article appears to be a discussion about AI research institutions potentially abandoning safety concerns, though the provided content fr

news.ycombinator.com·3mo ago