All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

The Debate Over "Source Available" vs. Open Source Software Licensing

By

geerlingguy

5mo ago· 4 min readenInsight

Summary

The article discusses the ongoing debate about what constitutes "open source" software, sparked by Ruby on Rails creator David Heinemeier Hansson releasing his Fizzy kanban tool under the O'Saasy license that restricts competing SaaS offerings. The author argues that while this violates the Open Source Initiative's definition, there's room for "source available" models that allow viewing and modifying code while restricting commercial use. The piece explores the tension between pure open source ideals and practical sustainability models for software creators.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
David Heinemeier Hansson (also known as DHH) released a new kanban tool, Fizzy, this week and called it open source.
People quickly pointed out that the O'Saasy license that Fizzy is released under blocks others from offering a competing SaaS version, which violates the Open Source Initiative's definition.
I've spent twenty years working on open source sustainability, and I have some thoughts.
The O'Saasy license that Fizzy is released under blocks others from offering a competing SaaS version, which violates the Open Source Initiative's definition.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Dries is the Founder and Project Lead of Drupal and the Co-founder and Executive Chair of Acquia.

You might also wanna read