All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Analysis of Ambiguous "May Be Licensed" Language in GitHub Mattermost Repository License

By

MallocVoidstar

3mo ago· 3 min readenCode

Summary

The article discusses a licensing issue with GitHub's Mattermost server repository, specifically pointing to ambiguous language in the LICENSE.txt file that states "may be licensed" to use source code. The author argues this phrasing is problematic and non-compliant with open source definitions, as it creates uncertainty about the conditions under which the code can be used. The content appears to be a technical critique of licensing practices in open source software, focusing on GitHub's platform and its implications for developers.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
May be licensed?? Under what conditions?
This is not compliant with open source definition.
LICENSE: _may be_ licensed to use source code; incorrect license grant.
Snippet from the RSS feed
https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server/blob/master/LICENSE.txt#L9 "May be licensed"?? Under what conditions? This is not compliant with open source definition.

You might also wanna read