All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Can designers afford to be publicly anti-AI? Creative community debates the career risks of taking a stance

By

Tom May

4mo ago· 7 min readenOpinion

Summary

A freelance designer writes into an advice column worried that being publicly anti-AI could harm their career. The article explores the tension between taking an ethical stance against generative AI (due to concerns about ethics, environment, and societal impact) and the fear of losing clients or being seen as virtue-signaling. The creative community weighs in on whether designers should be vocal about their anti-AI position or keep quiet to protect their business.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
I'm a freelance designer, and I'm openly uncomfortable with generative AI. Not because I hate technology, but because of its ethical, environmental and societal impact in its current form.
I want to work with clients who value human creativity, empathy and care. But I'm worried that being public about my stance could look like virtue signalling.
Taking a stance on generative AI might feel good, but could it lose you clients? Here's what our community has to say about this divisive issue.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Taking a stance on generative AI might feel good, but could it lose you clients? Here's what our community has to say about this divisive issue. Welcome to another edition of Dear Boom, our advice se...

You might also wanna read