Study Confirms Position Bias in arXiv Announcements Affects Citation and Readership
By
[Submitted on 27 Jul 2009]
A bagel you'd recommend to a friend without hedging.
Summary
This study examines how article position in arXiv daily announcements (ordered by submission time) correlates with later citation impact and early readership. The authors confirm a "self-promotion" effect where authors intentionally submit early, but also find a pure "visibility" effect: articles accidentally placed in early positions receive significantly more citations and downloads. For example, astrophysics articles in position 1 had 83% higher median citations overall, with a 44% visibility boost for accidental early placement. The study also uses machine learning to correlate early readership features with long-term citations, and discusses implications for impact metrics and recommender systems.
Key quotes
· 3 pulledAstrophysics articles announced in position 1, for example, overall received a median number of citations 83% higher, while those there accidentally had a 44% visibility boost.
For two large subcommunities of theoretical high energy physics, hep-th and hep-ph articles announced in position 1 had median numbers of citations 50% and 100% larger than for positions 5--15.
The median numbers of early full text downloads for astro-ph, hep-th, and hep-ph articles announced in position 1 were 82%, 61%, and 58% higher than for lower positions, respectively.
You might also wanna read
Corrected arXiv Submission Data Shows Steady Growth, Not Dramatic Surge in High-Energy Physics Papers
The article presents corrected arXiv preprint submission data showing that while there are year-over-year increases in submissions to the he
Analysis shows decline in arXiv paper links on Hacker News front page
The article analyzes a trend observed by the author: a decline in arXiv paper links appearing on Hacker News front pages. Using Claude to qu
dylancastillo.co·1mo agoarXiv Launches HTML Format for Research Papers to Improve Accessibility
arXiv, the popular preprint repository, has launched HTML versions of research papers alongside existing PDFs to improve accessibility. The
Systematic Analysis Reveals Widespread Information Leakage in Preprint Archives
This research paper presents a systematic security analysis of preprint archives like arXiv, revealing significant information leakage risks

arXiv Computer Science Category Updates Submission Requirements for Review Articles and Position Papers
arXiv's computer science category has implemented new submission requirements for review articles and position papers. These types of submis

ArXiv to ban authors for one year over unchecked AI-generated content in papers
ArXiv, the popular preprint research platform, is implementing new measures to combat the growing problem of AI-generated slop in academic p
