arXiv Computer Science Category Updates Submission Requirements for Review Articles and Position Papers
By
dw64
Master baker tier. Every paragraph earns its place on the tray.
Summary
arXiv's computer science category has implemented new submission requirements for review articles and position papers. These types of submissions must now be accepted at a journal or conference and complete successful peer review before being considered for arXiv. Authors must provide documentation of peer review acceptance, and submissions without this documentation will likely be rejected. The change addresses the unmanageable influx of review articles and position papers to the arXiv CS category.
Key quotes
· 5 pulledarXiv's computer science (CS) category has updated its moderation practice with respect to review (or survey) articles and position papers.
Before being considered for submission to arXiv's CS category, review articles and position papers must now be accepted at a journal or a conference and complete successful peer review.
When submitting review articles or position papers, authors must include documentation of successful peer review to receive full consideration.
Review/survey articles or position papers submitted to arXiv without this documentation will be likely to be rejected and not appear on arXiv.
This change is being implemented due to the unmanageable influx of review articles and position papers to arXiv CS.
You might also wanna read
Pandoc Templates for Academic Journal Formatting
A collection of Pandoc journal templates created by Michael Sachs, providing formatting templates for major academic journals including JASA
Pandoc Templates for Academic Journal Formatting
A collection of Pandoc journal templates created by Michael Sachs, providing formatting templates for major academic journals including JASA
SCRIPTed: An Open-Access Journal on Law, Technology & Society
SCRIPTed is an open-access, online, international, interdisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles, analysis pieces, case an
Columbia professor studying AI nearly publishes paper with AI-hallucinated reference, highlighting growing academic integrity concern
A Columbia University associate professor, Maxim Topaz, who researches AI applications in healthcare, nearly published a scientific paper co

ArXiv to ban authors for one year over unchecked AI-generated content in papers
ArXiv, the popular preprint research platform, is implementing new measures to combat the growing problem of AI-generated slop in academic p
The History of Pipes, Forks, and Zombies in Unix Systems
This article discusses the history and concept of pipes in Unix systems, focusing on Doug McIlroy's original vision of coupling programs lik
