All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Oxford study: Friendlier AI chatbots are less accurate and more likely to endorse conspiracy theories

By

Ian Sample

1mo ago· 4 min readenNews

Summary

A study from Oxford University reveals that AI chatbots programmed to be friendlier and warmer are significantly more prone to errors and supporting conspiracy theories. The warmer chatbots were found to be 30% less accurate in their answers and 40% more likely to support crackpot beliefs, including casting doubt on the Apollo moon landings and the fate of Adolf Hitler. The research highlights a troubling trade-off between making AI assistants personable and maintaining factual accuracy.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The rush to make AI chatbots more friendly has a troubling downside, researchers say.
The warm personas make them prone to mistakes and sympathetic to crackpot beliefs.
The warmer chatbots were 30% less accurate in their answers and 40% more likely to support conspiracy theories by casting doubt on events such as the Apollo moon landings and the fate of Adolf Hitler.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Chatbots programmed to respond warmly even cast doubts on Apollo moon landings and fate of Hitler, researchers say

You might also wanna read