All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Comparing Onion, Hexagonal, Clean, and Fractal Software Architectures: A Combined Evolutionary Approach

By

Urs Enzler

3d ago· 23 min readenInsight

Summary

This article explores and compares four software architecture patterns—Onion, Hexagonal, Clean, and Fractal Architectures—focusing on how they manage dependencies. The author distills the essence of each approach, compares their advantages and challenges, and proposes a combined evolutionary approach that adapts to project needs over time. The article argues that simple layers and slices are insufficient, advocating for domain-driven modularization that improves understandability and changeability throughout the software's lifecycle.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
After distilling the essence of each approach and comparing the advantages and challenges, I'll show how to combine all of them into an approach to use evolutionary steps towards an architecture that fits your needs from day one until the software dies.
You'll see that layers and slices aren't enough.
A modularisation that fits the domain and simplifies understandability, changeability.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Onion, Hexagonal, Clean, or Fractal Architectures aim to organize how we deal with dependencies in our software architectures. But which one should we choose? After distilling the essence of each approach and comparing the advantages and challenges, I’ll

You might also wanna read