All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Legal analysts criticize Justice Gorsuch's rationale in Supreme Court gun rights and marijuana case

By

Bennito L. Kelty

2h ago· 2 min readenNews

Summary

Legal analysts on the Legal AF podcast criticized Justice Neil Gorsuch's rationale in the United States v. Hemani Supreme Court case, which involved a Texas gun owner who possessed marijuana and admitted regular use. The case resulted in a unanimous 9-0 ruling, but analysts found Gorsuch's reasoning to be bizarre and absurd.

Source

bskyLegal analysts criticize Justice Gorsuch's rationale in Supreme Court gun rights and marijuana casebit.ly

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Legal analysts ripped the bizarre rationale in the ruling of a MAGA star on the Supreme Court.
Michael Popok and legal analyst Lisa Graves shared how put off they were by Justice Neil Gorsuch's opinion in the United States v. Hemani ruling.
A couple of legal analysts ripped the bizarre rationale in the ruling of a MAGA star on the Supreme Court.
Snippet from the RSS feed
A couple of legal analysts ripped the bizarre rationale in the ruling of a MAGA star on the Supreme Court.On the Legal AF podcast, host Michael Popok and legal analyst Lisa Graves shared how put off they were by Justice Neil Gorsuch's opinion in the Unite

You might also wanna read