All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

A principled framework for defining and estimating trait polygenicity from genetic data

By

Luke J. O’Connor1,2 Send email to [email protected] ∙ Guy Sella3,4 Send email to [email protected]

2h ago· 9 min readenInsight

Summary

This article proposes a principled definition of "polygenicity" for genetic traits, establishing mathematical measures that satisfy sensible properties. The authors define four specific measures of polygenicity, show how they differ, and demonstrate that three can be estimated from genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics. Applying these measures to 36 human traits, they find that most traits fall between the extremes of Mendelian (single-gene) and highly polygenic traits, with few occupying the large gap between these categories.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The 'polygenicity' of traits is often invoked, sometimes quantified, but rarely defined from first principles.
We propose a principled definition of polygenicity that encompasses a range of measures.
We estimate three measures for 36 human traits and find that few fall in the large gap between Mendelian and highly polygenic traits.
Snippet from the RSS feed
The “polygenicity” of traits is often invoked, sometimes quantified, but rarely defined from first principles. Here, we define polygenicity measures and argue why the definition is sensible. We estimate three measures for 36 human traits and find that few

You might also wanna read