All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Exploring the Nuances of Chain-of-Thought AI Reasoning

By

ingve

9mo ago· 7 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article expresses frustration with the focus on whether chain-of-thought AI reasoning is 'really' reasoning, rather than exploring more nuanced questions about its accuracy and multilingual capabilities. It references Apple's 'Illusion of Thinking' paper and mentions a new study from Arizona State University.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
There are many interesting questions to ask about chain-of-thought: how accurately it reflects the actual process going on, why training it 'from scratch' often produces chains that switch fluidly between multiple languages, and so on.
However, people keep asking the least interesting question possible: whether chain-of-thought reasoning is 'really' reasoning.
Apple took up this question in their Illusion of Thinking paper, which I’ve already written about.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Reading research papers and articles about chain-of-thought reasoning makes me frustrated. There are many interesting questions to ask about chain-of-thought…

You might also wanna read