All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Critical Analysis of Rust Programming Language's Practical Limitations

By

byko3y

6mo ago· 8 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article presents a critical perspective on the Rust programming language, arguing that despite its popularity and fan following, it fails to deliver on key expectations. The author acknowledges previously hating Rust partly as a reaction to its fanboyism, but outlines substantive criticisms including extremely slow compilation times (slower than C++), excessive complexity, and the language not being the 'better programming language' many were hoping for. The piece contrasts Rust's survey popularity with practical implementation issues that hinder developer productivity.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
I used to call myself a Rust hater, but really I was doing it just to compensate for the perceivable fanboyism e.g. Rust tops on stackoverflow surveys as most-loved language.
Lots of people were waiting for a better programming language, but got Rust instead.
Its compilation is slow. I mean SLOW. Slower than C++. I know over years Rust became several times faster, but objectively we need it to be two orders of magnitude faster, not just two times.
It's complex. Just as co
Snippet from the RSS feed
I used to call myself a Rust hater, but really I was doing it just to compensate for the perceivable fanboyism e.g. Rust tops on stackoverflow surveys as most-loved language. There are many reasons to hate C++, and I hate C++ too. Lots of people were wait

You might also wanna read