All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Improved CRISPR base editing shows safer embryo gene editing, but major ethical questions remain

By

Michael Le Page

8h ago· 5 min readenNews

Summary

A US team has used an improved CRISPR technique called base editing to edit human embryos without introducing harmful mutations, marking a potential safety advance over the controversial 2018 Chinese experiment. However, the article notes that a major ethical and safety issue remains unresolved, suggesting that while the technical risks may be decreasing, the debate over gene-editing babies is far from settled.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
When a rogue researcher in China revealed in 2018 that he had used CRISPR to create three gene-edited children, his actions were almost universally condemned by biologists around the world.
The main objection was not that gene-editing babies is wrong in itself, but that the CRISPR technique used was not safe and had a very high risk of causing harmful mutations.
Now, a team in the US has used an improved form of CRISPR, known as base editing, to edit healthy embryos and shown that it can be done without introducing unwanted mutations.
Snippet from the RSS feed
A team in the US has reported promising results after using an improved form of CRISPR to gene-edit human embryos, but a major issue remains unsolved

You might also wanna read