All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Analyzing Loss Functions in Diffusion Bridge Samplers

By

badmonster

11mo ago· 2 min readenInsight

Summary

Diffusion bridges in deep-learning methods for sampling from unnormalized distributions are analyzed, comparing the performance of Log Variance (LV) loss and reverse Kullback-Leibler (rKL) loss. The study shows that rKL loss with the log-derivative trick consistently outperforms LV loss, especially for diffusion bridges with learned diffusion coefficients.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Recent works show that the Log Variance (LV) loss consistently outperforms the reverse Kullback-Leibler (rKL) loss when using the reparametrization trick to compute rKL-gradients.
From a practical perspective we find that rKL-LD requires significantly less hyperparameter optimization and yields more stable training behavior.
Experimental results with different types of diffusion bridges on challenging benchmarks show that samplers trained with the rKL-LD loss achieve better performance.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Diffusion bridges are a promising class of deep-learning methods for sampling from unnormalized distributions. Recent works show that the Log Variance (LV) loss consistently outperforms the reverse Kullback-Leibler (rKL) loss when using the reparametrizat

You might also wanna read