All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Analyzing Bundler Performance: Can Ruby's Package Manager Match uv's Speed?

By

ibobev

5mo ago· 17 min readenInsight

Summary

The article explores the performance comparison between Bundler (Ruby's package manager) and uv (a fast Python package installer), examining why Bundler isn't as fast as uv and whether it can achieve similar performance. The author, who was challenged at RailsWorld about this issue, investigates the technical differences between the two tools, analyzes their approaches to dependency resolution and installation, and presents findings from research and a presentation at XO Ruby Portland. The core argument is that Bundler can potentially match uv's speed with optimizations, though there are fundamental architectural differences to consider.

Key quotes

· 4 pulled
I firmly believe the answer is 'Bundler can be as fast as uv' (where 'as fast' has a margin of error lol)
Immediately my inner voice said 'YA, WHY CAN'T IT BE AS FAST AS UV????'
At RailsWorld earlier this year, I got nerd sniped by someone. They asked 'why can't Bundler be as fast as uv?'
Since then I've been thinking about and investigating this problem, going so far as to give a presentation at XO Ruby Portland about Bundler performance
Snippet from the RSS feed
At RailsWorld earlier this year, I got nerd sniped by someone. They asked “why can’t Bundler be as fast as uv?” Immediately my inner voice said “YA, WHY CAN’T IT BE AS FAST AS UV????” My inner voice likes to shout at me, especially when someone asks a que

You might also wanna read