All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Analysis of macOS Tahoe's Icon Design Failures Against Apple's Own Interface Guidelines

By

lylejantzi3rd

4mo ago· 18 min readenInsight

Summary

The article critiques Apple's macOS Tahoe icon design by comparing it to Apple's own 1992 Human Interface Guidelines. The author analyzes how the new icons violate fundamental design principles, making them unpleasant, distracting, illegible, messy, cluttered, confusing, and frustrating. The critique examines specific design failures in Tahoe's icons through screenshots from macOS 26.1 and 26.2, focusing on how they deviate from established interface design best practices.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
Adding unpleasant, distracting, illegible, messy, cluttered, confusing, frustrating icons (their words, not mine!) to every menu item
Looking at the first principles of icon design—and how Apple failed to apply all of them in macOS Tahoe
It's bad. But why exactly is it bad? Let's delve into it!
I was reading Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines from 1992 and found this nice illustration
Sequoia → Tahoe
Snippet from the RSS feed
Looking at the first principles of icon design—and how Apple failed to apply all of them in macOS Tahoe

You might also wanna read