All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Algorithmic Monocultures in Hiring: Largest Study of 3.4 Million Applicants Reveals Widespread Vendor Concentration

By

Rishi Bommasani* Stanford University

2h ago· 6 min readenInsight

Summary

This paper presents the largest empirical study of algorithmic hiring to date, analyzing data from 3.4 million real job applicants who submitted 4 million applications to 156 employers across 11 market sectors. The research reveals that over 90% of U.S. employers rely on hiring algorithms, and many use algorithms from the same few vendors, creating "algorithmic monocultures" in the hiring process. Every application in the study was assessed by algorithmic screening tools, raising concerns about uniformity, bias, and lack of diversity in candidate evaluation methods.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Over 90% of U.S. employers rely on hiring algorithms to screen job applicants.
Many different employers use algorithms from the same few vendors.
We conduct the largest empirical study of algorithmic hiring with data for 3.4 million real job applicants submitting 4 million applications to 156 employers across 11 market sectors.
Snippet from the RSS feed
Paper Code Blog Cite

You might also wanna read