All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

arXiv to ban researchers for submitting AI-generated slop papers

By

Vitomir Kovanovic

2d ago· 4 min readenNews

Summary

arXiv, a key pre-print platform for scientific research, is cracking down on AI-generated papers by banning researchers who submit work with obvious AI-generated errors for up to a year. The move addresses a growing flood of low-quality AI slop in academic publishing, though some critics argue the response may be too harsh or that more AI tools might actually be needed to solve the problem.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The pre-print website arXiv has announced that researchers who put their names to papers which included errors clearly generated by artificial intelligence (AI) will face a year-long ban and ongoing restrictions.
The move is a response to a growing influx of AI-generated papers faced by scholarly journals as well as sites such as arXiv, which serve as unofficial platforms for research publication ahead of peer review.
However, not everyone agrees that arXiv's response to the problem is appropriate – and the solution to the flood of AI slop research may involve more AI, not less.
Snippet from the RSS feed
AI infractions could result in a year-long ban from the arXiv system, which is an essential communication channel in many fields of research.

You might also wanna read