All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
Bluesky
Twitter
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

A Human Artist Explains Why They Changed Their Mind About AI Art

By

asher

3h ago· 8 min readenOpinion

Summary

A full-time human artist reflects on their initial condemnation of AI-generated art and explains why they've changed their position. The artist describes their own career creating drawings for publications like The New Yorker and selling merchandise, acknowledging why they felt threatened by generative AI. However, they argue that AI art can be a legitimate creative tool rather than a replacement for human artists, and that the art community's initial rejection was misguided. The piece serves as a personal defense of AI art from someone whose livelihood depends on traditional artistic creation.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
AI art is good and I was wrong to condemn it.
I am a fulltime artist. I draw every day. I then turn around and sell my drawings, both to publications like The New Yorker and directly to my fans.
So, you can see why I might not have been thrilled at the introduction of generative art
Snippet from the RSS feed
Why I was wrong

You might also wanna read