All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Retrospective: Why 'X-Men: Apocalypse' Is Better Than Its Reputation and 'The Last Stand' Is Worse

By

Jesse Hassenger

5d ago· 10 min readenInsight

Summary

A retrospective analysis comparing two X-Men films on their anniversaries: X-Men: Apocalypse (10 years) and X-Men: The Last Stand (20 years). The article argues that Apocalypse is unfairly maligned and deserves a better reputation, while The Last Stand is actually the franchise's worst entry and deserves even more criticism than it already receives. It examines the in-joke from Apocalypse about third installments being the worst, and makes the case that the joke should be aimed squarely at The Last Stand rather than Apocalypse.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
At least we can all agree the third one's always the worst.
It's clearly an in-joke, but on who? Most likely the target is X-Men: The Last Stand, the third installment in the X-Men series released almost exactly a decade before Apocalypse.
There's only one really bad X-Men threequel, and it's not Apocalypse!
Snippet from the RSS feed
There’s only one really bad X-Men threequel, and it’s not Apocalypse!

You might also wanna read