Study suggests germs, not personality, may explain why first-born children outperform siblings
By
The Economist
Soggy bottom. Skim the top, leave the rest on the tray.
Summary
A new study suggests that the reason first-born children tend to outperform younger siblings in educational achievement and income may be related to germs rather than personality traits. While stereotypes portray eldest children as responsible and younger ones as rebellious, large-scale studies find no meaningful link between birth order and personality. The research points to biological factors—specifically, exposure to germs—as a potential explanation for the cognitive advantages observed in first-borns.
Key quotes
· 4 pulledSORRY, YOUNGER siblings.
On standard measures of success, such as educational achievement and income, first-borns do better.
Stereotypes cast eldest children as responsible and younger ones as rebellious—but large-scale studies find no meaningful link between birth order and personality types.
New research points to something rather different: germs.
You might also wanna read
IQ differences of identical twins reared apart are influenced by education
Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: Evidence for Inherited Pathogen Avoidance in C. elegans
This article discusses transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, specifically focusing on evidence that learned avoidance of pathogenic bact

How Early Independence Shapes Adult Social Patterns and Friendship Dynamics
The article explores how early independence and self-reliance in childhood can shape adult social patterns, particularly the tendency to mai
The Child-Like Role of Dogs in Western Societies
Genetics vs. Lifestyle: How Family History Shows Longevity Isn't Just About Healthy Habits
The article discusses the role of genetics versus lifestyle in longevity, using personal family history as an example. The author notes that
