OMB's Proposed Rule Would Allow Political Appointees to Override Peer Review for Federal Research Grants
By
Elizabeth Ginexi
Master baker tier. Every paragraph earns its place on the tray.
Summary
This article analyzes the implications of OMB's proposed Federal Financial Assistance Rule (OMB-2026-0034), which would allow political appointees to approve or deny grant applications based on alignment with administration policies, bypassing peer review. The rule would enable exclusion of applicants based on institutional affiliations and allow denial of scientifically meritorious proposals deemed to involve "anti-American values." The article details how this fundamentally alters the federal research funding process by inserting political oversight into scientific grantmaking at agencies like NIH and NSF.
Key quotes
· 3 pulledA program officer at NIH or NSF wants to solicit applications for a study on health disparities. Before the NOFO is posted, the program must be designed to align with administration policies and priorities.
A senior political appointee must approve the NOFO. Applications can be excluded based on institutional affiliations.
A researcher submits a proposal. It passes peer review. A political appointee reviews it and decides it involves 'anti-American values.' It is denied. The peer review is overridden.
You might also wanna read
White House proposes giving political appointees final authority over federal research grants
The White House has proposed new Office of Management and Budget regulations that would give political appointees final approval authority o
scientificamerican.com·1d ago
Trump Administration Places Federal Grant Funding Under Political Control
The Trump administration has issued an executive order placing all federal grant funding, including research grants, under political control
arstechnica.com·9mo ago