All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

UK's nudity-blocker mandate raises serious privacy concerns; transparency of source code needed

By

Paul Hill

4d ago· 8 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article criticizes the UK government's Online Safety Act and its new mandate requiring nudity-blocking software on smartphones sold in the country. It argues that this approach creates a significant privacy disaster, as it could lead to mass surveillance, false positives, and censorship. The author contends that if such software is to be mandated, the source code must be publicly auditable to ensure it doesn't overreach or compromise user privacy. The piece examines the tension between child safety goals and fundamental privacy rights, warning that opaque, proprietary scanning systems could be abused or expanded beyond their original intent.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
The UK government, just like many state governments in the US and national governments around the world, has begun going on a bit of a power trip when it comes to digital safety.
UK PM Keir Starmer is calling on Apple and Google, and presumably other mobile OS makers, to scan phones for nudity.
We must be able to see the source code to ensure these systems don't become a privacy disaster.
Snippet from the RSS feed
The UK government is now mandating nudity-blocking software for smartphones sold in the country. I look at why this is a privacy nightmare and the safeguards that must be in place.

You might also wanna read