All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Two-Year Review: AWS to Bare Metal Migration Saves $230,000 Annually

By

ndhandala

7mo ago· 6 min readenInsight

Summary

Two years after migrating from AWS to bare metal servers, the company revisits their cost savings of $230,000 per year and addresses key questions from the tech community. They discuss their experience over 24 months, covering topics like Reserved Instances, failover strategies for single racks, personnel costs, and when cloud solutions remain preferable. The article provides internal numbers and responds to feedback from Hacker News and Reddit discussions about their original migration story.

Key quotes

· 5 pulled
When we published How moving from AWS to Bare-Metal saved us $230,000 /yr. in 2023, the story travelled far beyond our usual readership.
The discussion threads on Hacker News and Reddit were packed with sharp questions: did we skip Reserved Instances, how do we fail over a single rack, what about the people cost, and when is cloud still the better answer?
This follow-up is our long-form reply.
Over the last twenty-four months we:
$230,000 / yr savings
Snippet from the RSS feed
Two years after our AWS-to-bare-metal migration, we revisit the numbers, share what changed, and address the biggest questions from Hacker News and Reddit.

You might also wanna read