Trump's Pro-Vaping Stance: Political Signaling Over Science
By
Jamie Ducharme
12d ago· 6 min readenInsight
100/100
Golden Brown
Bagelometer↗
A five-star bake. Worth schmearing, sharing, saving.
Score100TypeanalysisSentimentnegative
Summary
The article examines the political motivations behind Donald Trump's pro-vaping stance, suggesting it's less about science and more about appealing to a demographic that often doesn't vote. It recounts how the Trump administration initially vowed to ban flavored e-cigarettes to combat a youth vaping epidemic affecting nearly 30% of teens, but later backtracked—limiting the ban to pod-based vapes like Juuls and sparing menthol flavors. The piece frames Trump's positioning as a "hero" to vapers as political vice-signaling rather than sound policy.
Key quotes
· 4 pulledIn December of 2019, Mitch Zeller, who at the time ran the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products, got an urgent phone call from a fellow staffer at the agency.
A few months earlier, President Donald Trump and his administration had vowed to take e-cigarettes in every flavor except tobacco off the market to quash a youth vaping epidemic that, at the time, saw almost 30 percent of American teens using nicotine.
By the time Zeller received that December call, he says, the White House had different instructions for the FDA: Limit the ban to pod-based vapes, like Juuls, and leave menthol flavors alone.
The White House says Trump's pro-vape stance is based on 'gold standard science.' It feels more like vice-signaling to a demographic that often doesn't vote—over products that are widely available.
The White House says Trump’s pro-vape stance is based on “gold standard science.” It feels more like vice-signaling to a demographic that often doesn’t vote—over products that are widely available.
