All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Climate attribution science could enable lawsuits against major carbon emitters for extreme weather damages

By

Thomas Lewton

3h ago· 16 min readenInsight

Summary

The article explores how a new form of climate attribution science — specifically "extreme event attribution" and "source attribution" — is being developed to link specific extreme weather events (floods, heatwaves, storms) directly to individual fossil fuel companies. It profiles the story of Arif Pujianto, an Indonesian man whose home on Pari Island has been repeatedly devastated by tidal floods linked to rising seas. The piece examines the legal and scientific implications of this modeling approach, which could be used to hold major carbon emitters accountable in court for climate damages. It discusses the work of climate scientists like Friederike Otto and legal experts who argue that attribution science could become a powerful tool for climate litigation, forcing companies to pay for the damages their emissions have caused.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
I feel angry and afraid. If Pari Island sinks, where will we live?
This is the secret weapon that could finally force climate action.
The science is clear: we can now link specific extreme weather events to the emissions of specific companies.
Snippet from the RSS feed
An ambitious form of climate modelling aims to pin the blame for disasters – from floods to heatwaves – on specific companies. Is this the tool we need to effectively prosecute the world’s biggest carbon emitters?

You might also wanna read