All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

NIH 2025 Public Access Policy: Expanding readership while creating new publishing cost barriers

By

Caitlin R. Ryus ,

10d ago· 11 min readenInsight

Summary

This Perspective article by Caitlin Ryus and colleagues examines the NIH 2025 Public Access Policy, which mandates immediate public access to NIH-funded research. While the policy successfully expands who can read scientific publications, the authors argue it creates new financial barriers that disproportionately affect researchers with fewer resources. The policy shifts costs from readers to authors through article processing charges (APCs), potentially exacerbating inequities in who can afford to publish scientific research. The article critically analyzes the unintended consequences of open-access mandates without accompanying funding or structural support for researchers at under-resourced institutions.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
While expanding who can read science, the policy risks creating new barriers to who can afford to perform and publish their science.
The NIH 2025 Public Access Policy represents a significant shift in how federally funded research is disseminated, but its implementation raises critical questions about equity in scientific publishing.
By mandating immediate access without addressing the underlying costs of publication, the policy may inadvertently reinforce existing disparities in the scientific community.
Snippet from the RSS feed
In this Perspective, Caitlin Ryus and colleagues discuss the NIH 2025 Public Access Policy, highlighting that while expanding who can read science, the policy risks creating new barriers to who can afford to perform and publish their science.

You might also wanna read

NIH and NASA impose new restrictions on international research collaborations, causing confusion among scientists

U.S. government research funders, including the NIH and NASA, have imposed unprecedented restrictions on U.S. scientists collaborating and p

science.org·15d ago

NIH and NASA impose new restrictions on international research collaborations, causing confusion among scientists

U.S. government research funders, including the NIH and NASA, have imposed unprecedented restrictions on U.S. scientists collaborating and p

science.org·15d ago

NIH Policy Shift Reduces Number of Science Grants While Increasing Individual Award Amounts

The article reveals a significant but quiet policy shift at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) where the agency has been making fewer b

nytimes.com·5mo ago

ACM Transitions All Publications to Open Access Starting January 2026

The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) has transitioned all its publications and related artifacts in the ACM Digital Library to open

acm.org·5mo ago

ACM Announces Transition to Full Open Access by 2025

ACM is transitioning to a fully Open Access (OA) publishing model by the end of 2025, making all its computing research content freely avail

acm.org·10mo ago

arXiv Launches HTML Format for Research Papers to Improve Accessibility

arXiv, the popular preprint repository, has launched HTML versions of research papers alongside existing PDFs to improve accessibility. The

info.arxiv.org·6mo ago

Transparent peer review to be extended to all of Nature's research papers

nature.com·1y ago