All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why One-Shot Project Funding Fails for Software Development

By

Richard Mironov

4h ago· 7 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article argues that funding software development as one-time projects (building v1.0 and then moving on) is fundamentally flawed. Unlike physical goods like hammers, software requires ongoing maintenance, updates, and support. Organizations that treat software as a finite project inevitably face frustration, cost overruns, failure to deliver outcomes, and eventual abandonment of the work—only to repeat the cycle with a replacement project later. The author draws on extensive experience observing this pattern play out hundreds of times across different organizations.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
Organizations that fund the building of software as one-time projects will inevitably be frustrated, fail to deliver outcomes, overspend, and eventually discard the work.
I've seen this play out hundreds of times.
A hammer is done when it leaves the factory, and it's mine when I buy it at my hardware store. I don't expect upgrades or support or new...
Snippet from the RSS feed
Organizations that fund the building of software as one-time projects  ("once we ship v1.0 of Product X, we move everyone onto Thing Y") will inevitably be frustrated, fail to deliver outcomes, overspend, and eventually discard the work.  Only to fund a r

You might also wanna read