All Topics
All Topics
Technology
Technology
Design
Design
Programming
Programming
Science
Science
News
News
Gaming
Gaming
Entertainment
Entertainment
Business
Business
Finance
Finance
Sports
Sports
Health
Health
Food
Food
Travel
Travel
Art
Art
Music
Music
Books
Books
Education
Education
Politics
Politics
Personal
Personal
No algorithm. No AI slop. No ads. Just RSS. Pro-human. Indie writers. Real journalism. Open web. Chronological. Hand toasted.

Why AI products' empty-state design failure leads to high user drop-off

By

Adi Leviim

2d ago· 6 min readenOpinion

Summary

The article argues that AI chat products have abandoned decades of UX research on "empty states" (the initial blank screen users see before engaging with a product) by replacing them with a simple prompt input box. This design choice leads to high first-session drop-off rates because users are given no guidance, onboarding, or context. The author draws on firsthand experience as a founder and engineer, noting that traditional empty states served to orient, educate, and motivate users, while AI prompt boxes assume users already know what to do. The piece critiques the industry's over-reliance on the prompt box as a universal interface and suggests this creates UX gaps that third-party tools can fill.

Key quotes

· 3 pulled
AI products replaced 20 years of empty-state research with a prompt box, and the first-session drop-off shows it.
I have a commercial interest in those products having UX gaps that third-party tools can fill. I disclose this upfront so readers can factor it into the argument below.
All insights, data, decisions, and stories are my own.
Snippet from the RSS feed
The death of the empty state in AI products AI products replaced 20 years of empty-state research with a prompt box, and the first-session drop-off shows it. Editor’s note: I wrote this article …

You might also wanna read